Analysis: SpiceJet third quarter fiscal 2013~2014 results – excess capacity killing industry

Earlier this week, low cost carrier SpiceJet reported its latest round of disappointing financial results, reporting a Rs. 172.80 crore net loss for the third quarter of fiscal year 2013~2014 (3Q FY14), swinging from a net profit of Rs. 102.01 crore during the same period last year. The carrier blamed high fuel prices and rupee depreciation for the net loss, as well as a poor pricing environment due to excessive expansion by SpiceJet and fellow low cost carriers IndiGo and GoAir.

Operating revenues grew 14% year-over-year (YOY) to Rs. 1,807.73 crore, as the carrier’s international expansion and the addition of roughly seven new aircraft on net contributed to revenue growth. SpiceJet also resorted heavily to bulk-discounting and fare sales to fill its seats during the period. While the third quarter is typically the strongest period for Indian airlines, the residual effects of a depreciating currency, excessive discounting of fares, and slowing macroeconomic growth (especially in Delhi where SpiceJet is unusually concentrated) meant that revenue results were soft for the period.

On a unit basis, revenue per available seat kilometre plummeted 6% YOY to Rs. 3.6 on 20% YOY capacity growth as measured in available seat kilometres (ASKs). While the carrier did report a mild increase of 3.2% in revenue per passenger to Rs. 4,551, it was more than offset by the devaluation in the value of the rupee. Still, the weak demand environment meant that even this modest increase in fares led to a 4.5% decline in load factor to 70.5%. Based on our calculations, the carrier’s break-even load factor is slightly over 76.5%.

Turning to expenses, total operating expenses jumped an alarming 32.1% to Rs. 1,962.31 Crore, led by a 31% increase in fuel costs to Rs. 941.12 Crore, representing 48% of total expenses. On a per-ASK basis (which is the best way to evaluate the expense performance of carriers in a high growth phase), fuel expenses rose roughly 9.1%, and this could be attributed almost entirely to the depreciation of the rupee, as government owned oil marketing companies have totally passed on these price increases to the airlines. Other cost-line items saw major increases, with maintenance costs rising 53.3% YOY to Rs. 238.95 Crore and airport charges rising 39.8% YOY to Rs. 127.59 Crore. SpiceJet in particular was slammed by airport charge increases in Delhi since so much of its capacity is concentrated in the nation’s capital.

Operating margin came in at an abysmal -8.5%, flipping negative from a strong 6.4% the year before. According to SpiceJet, the net adverse effect of currency devaluation was Rs. 63 Crore, not including the increase in fuel prices driven by this effect. This headline should not be allowed to mask the larger structural problems in SpiceJet’s business model. India’s LCCs are all suffering due to the economic malaise, but SpiceJet in particular has made several mis-steps over the past year and a half that have put it in its current position.

It’s international operation, while a necessary risk, has failed to yield results in the manner that its nascent Bombardier Dash 8 Q400 operation has. Here SpiceJet is as much a victim of timing and circumstance as anything else – it launched these new routes right as Asia and India were transitioning into a period of lower growth. Still, on the domestic side, SpiceJet might do well to look inwards. It is basic economics to understand that controlling supply (capacity) is the best way to raise fares in the airline industry, yet despite costs that they know are going to rise, Indian carriers continue to dump capacity onto the market. Competitor IndiGo, this week added the 75th aircraft to its fleet. Today, they are paying the price for the economic largesse in ordering too many aircraft during boom years, but a little capacity discipline (perhaps by deferring orders or cancelling them all together) would go a long way towards allowing the existing airline players to regroup before the next wave of start-up carriers hits when Air Asia India and the Tata – Singapore Airlines venture tak-eoff to join Air Costa in plying the skies.

Regardless, SpiceJet’s financial performance in the quarter was particularly disappointing. And as the airline industry and Indian economy as a whole hurtle towards a pivotal moment in the upcoming general elections, the carrier who seemed to be turning the corner in FY 13 has once again faltered.

– Vinay

About Devesh Agarwal

A electronics and automotive product management, marketing and branding expert, he was awarded a silver medal at the Lockheed Martin innovation competition 2010. He is ranked 6th on Mashable's list of aviation pros on Twitter and in addition to Bangalore Aviation, he has contributed to leading publications like Aviation Week, Conde Nast Traveller India, The Economic Times, and The Mint (a Wall Street Journal content partner). He remains a frequent flier and shares the good, the bad, and the ugly about the Indian aviation industry without fear or favour.

Check Also

Pictures: Indian Air Force Rafale, Chinook and Apache at Aero India 2021

Aero India 2021 began on the 3rd of February and on display were three of …

Guide to traveling on Air-Bubble and Vande Bharat Mission (VBM) flights (Updated 6 Dec 20)

by Sanjiv Kapoor Former COO, Spicejet and former CSCO of Vistara I keep getting questions …

4 comments

  1. Yet even with this many competitors, international airfare to India is much more expensive than Sri Lanka, UAE, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, etc. Fuel taxes and airport charges are way too high.

    • I do not agree with your argument. Singapore airport charges one of the highest taxes in the world. Fuel charges will never affect International carriers flying to India as they do not pay Indian prices and they pay International prices. Moreover these taxes should only affect the flights from India and not flights to India. Flights from India to Europe are always cheaper per mile compared to the same from Singapore. The only reason for cheaper flights to certain destinations is the flexibility for the airline to operate larger aircraft. Delhi and Mumbai are not yet in competition for being great transit points. See the number of airlines that use 5th and 6th freedom from Delhi and Mumbai. I could see only one between chinese taipei to Rome. That is the bottom line for prices to be on the high.

  2. This is not excess capacity, it is lack of alternative airports and poor infrastructure problems. Strategies are just sheep headed. Traditional hub and spoke strategies do not work in India. Airline industry is not pulling the masses on the planes. You need to understand the train and bus convenience between several city pairs. For ex. Bangalore is poorly connected to the east coast (Vijayawada, Rajahmundray, Vishakapatnam, Bhubaneswar) by train but till date not many direct flights. Aircosta is full on weekends between Vijayawada and Bangalore. Flights need not be daily and should be after work timings for weekends. Slots are not a problem for these airports. Alternate airports at bigger cities definitely improve the market. Hyderabad old airport was made useless now. Most of the airlines run to small cities to cover their percent schedules to tiers. People definitely pay as long as there is proper connectivity.

    • I agree with him about excess capacity not being the biggest issue. I feel high costs are the biggest issue for Indian aviation.